![]() ![]() Also, even when you do need JavaScript, you generally need it from the original host and maybe one other (e.g., ) you don't need it from the analytics and advertising hosts, for example.īuying things with security add-ons installed sometimes can be tricky: When you click 'buy', the host site sometimes contacts destinations that were previously unknown to your browser (payment processors, etc.), meaning you wouldn't know to enable them. To use web applications, obviously you need JavaScript. specialized in defining and guarding the boundaries of each sensitive web application"Īlso, there's a project to create a GUI for just the ABE component, called SABER by delivering a firewall-like component running inside the browser. "The idea behind the Application Boundaries Enforcer (ABE) module is hardening the web application oriented protections. "Many of the threats NoScript is currently capable of handling, such as XSS, CSRF or ClickJacking, have one common evil root: lack of proper isolation at the web application level." "Living inside the browser, the ABE component can take advantage of its privileged placement for enforcing web application boundaries, because it always knows the real origin of each HTTP request" * A pretty sophisticated firewall in your browser, Application Boundaries Enforcer (ABE), where you can even write your own policies: * Clearclick: Detects invisible elements which cover clicked visible elements * Filters WebGL, XSLT, Sophisticated XSS protection: Look up XSS on these pages: * Shift+click on host name, and pull up info on trustability from database NoScript provides many features that uMatrix does not: That would greatly reduce the learning curve. I have yet to find a good tutorial for uMatrix yet on how to make some pre-defined rules for common sites. But you should be able to whitelist those once then add them to your permanent whitelist. Anything which needs to reach out to jquery, ajax, etc. ![]() This is particularly irritating if there's a captcha on a form. Any page with a Google Captcha on it will take several refreshes to completely let them through. First youtube, then s., then, THEN you might finally get a video. It will take about three or four refreshes before you can whitelist everything necessary to get Youtube working. There are some growing pains associated with it, as there are with NS. I switched awhile back and found it somewhat more usable than NoScript, insofar as it usually allows Javascript on the local site by default, while automatically blocking JS on third-party domains. Most will get annoyed with how slow it make Firefox and how much effort it takes to make their favorite sites work the way they want it while blocking everything else.Made by the same developer of uBlock Origin, allows blocking of Javascript and other aspects of the site. Certain sites will not work unless they have full access and every time you install NoScript you have to do all the customization all over again.All in all I don't recommend NoScript for most. This should be used with caution and most of the time the default is fine for most and only add sites you use that need full javascript access to function.The downsides are the fact it is time consuming to set up for maximum protection. ![]() If you wish for a site to be fully allowed or disabled just right click on the add-on and choose your preference. It's pretty sim ple to use but can be time consuming and will slow down your surfing. By default it partially blocks all sites except on the default whitelist. NoScript is a very powerful add-on for Firefox that adds extra protection by disabling Javascript on certain sites.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |